From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ABI incompatibilities with MinGW GCC 4.7.0 Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2012 21:13:07 +0300 Message-ID: <834nqktkuk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83ipf2ustm.fsf@gnu.org> <871ulopu3r.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <83k3zgtywl.fsf@gnu.org> <87wr3go3u8.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1339265593 20650 80.91.229.3 (9 Jun 2012 18:13:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2012 18:13:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Achim Gratz Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 09 20:13:12 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SdQ9t-0002DI-9Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2012 20:13:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44412 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SdQ9t-0004G7-2i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2012 14:13:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34266) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SdQ9q-0004Ft-Kl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2012 14:13:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SdQ9o-00037m-Pg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2012 14:13:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:63727) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SdQ9o-00037e-IL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2012 14:13:04 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M5D004003VJZM00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2012 21:13:02 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.210.75]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M5D004P43XQLO80@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 09 Jun 2012 21:13:02 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <87wr3go3u8.fsf@Rainer.invalid> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:150865 Archived-At: > From: Achim Gratz > Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2012 18:19:27 +0200 > > > But what bothers me most is that no one said this is the only change > > that affects C programs. > > It's said to be the only _binary_ incompatibility. Where did you see that? I don't think I have, but maybe I missed something. Thanks.