From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: inlinable functions instead of macros Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 05:45:31 +0300 Message-ID: <834nnzeh10.fsf@gnu.org> References: <503001D6.6010305@cs.ucla.edu> <83628fewup.fsf@gnu.org> <503009A1.5000002@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1345344324 28411 80.91.229.3 (19 Aug 2012 02:45:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 02:45:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 19 04:45:24 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T2vW0-00017r-0s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 04:45:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40207 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T2vVy-0006GE-OA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 22:45:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36345) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T2vVv-0006G4-Vx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 22:45:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T2vVv-0004Ah-4P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 22:45:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:45956) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T2vVu-0004AU-SX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 22:45:19 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M8Z00M00E1HL800@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 05:45:17 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M8Z00MOREBGCD60@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 05:45:17 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <503009A1.5000002@cs.ucla.edu> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:152654 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 14:31:13 -0700 > From: Paul Eggert > CC: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > On 08/18/2012 02:03 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > What do __FUNCTION__ and __func__ hold for an inlined function? > > The name of the inlined function itself, which is not what's > wanted here. Sounds like this could be a starting point for a GCC feature that is wanted here.