From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: make distclean and quail Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 21:10:14 +0300 Message-ID: <834natpim1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8338rf4yor.fsf@gnu.org> <83txjv3iui.fsf@gnu.org> <83d2pkqh96.fsf@gnu.org> <83bo54qbb0.fsf@gnu.org> <831u5zqfsl.fsf@gnu.org> <83ob92q3jq.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1376417465 22295 80.91.229.3 (13 Aug 2013 18:11:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 18:11:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 13 20:11:05 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V9J3g-0006Hj-DJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 20:11:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54376 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V9J3f-0006lA-NY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 14:11:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54408) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V9J3X-0006kn-E3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 14:11:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V9J3R-0008Rj-JW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 14:10:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:60611) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V9J3R-0008Rd-BU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 14:10:49 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MRH00J00EAOBK00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 21:09:47 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MRH00I2LEGAN2M0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 21:09:47 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:162673 Archived-At: > From: Juanma Barranquero > Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 18:29:13 +0200 > Cc: Emacs developers > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Then I suggest to collect the Makefile's as well, with each log. > > Will do. > > > The question is: do all of the "bad" builds have this part in them? > > Anecdotal evidence* suggests that all bad builds had reconfiguration, > but not all reconfigurations triggered a bad build. There's one other player in this drama: config.status. Can you look inside it and see how it spells srcdir values? Also, please compare config.status from a good and a bad build. Are you using MSYS Sed and Gawk? Or is there a chance one or both of these are MinGW programs?