From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive? Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 18:24:29 +0200 Message-ID: <834mpk29mq.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5505E34C.4000106@dancol.org> <55064EC8.9010505@dancol.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1426523102 6150 80.91.229.3 (16 Mar 2015 16:25:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 16:25:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dancol@dancol.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 16 17:24:53 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YXXox-0004jC-Ns for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 17:24:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50457 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXXox-0002X8-4r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 12:24:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43946) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXXou-0002X2-22 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 12:24:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXXoq-0006p6-K5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 12:24:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:60007) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXXoq-0006ot-CB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 12:24:44 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NLB00700C8AXQ00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 18:24:43 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NLB0076NC96UV80@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 18:24:43 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:183910 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 08:49:02 -0400 > Cc: Emacs developers > > > So you propose effectively making inhibit-point-motion-hooks default to > > t? Why not just do precisely that? > > Because IIRC inhibit-point-motion-hooks also inhibits cursor-motion > hooks Now I'm confused: there's no cursor-motion in Emacs, only point-motion. But you already know that, so I don't understand what are you alluding to here.