From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Speed of keyboard macro execution? Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 22:43:45 +0200 Message-ID: <834mfq9gqm.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20151209163954.0cefcc7f@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <87si3bcltu.fsf@isaac.fritz.box> <20151209180343.5a67c0e7@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <83r3iu9rvp.fsf@gnu.org> <20151210120051.6be8201f@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <87k2omciy2.fsf@isaac.fritz.box> <20151210123312.39c417c9@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <83lh929omw.fsf@gnu.org> <87k2omta6x.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83d1ue9lns.fsf@gnu.org> <87fuzat7ot.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <837fkm9ire.fsf@gnu.org> <877fkmt694.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1449780246 22491 80.91.229.3 (10 Dec 2015 20:44:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 20:44:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: perry@piermont.com, deng@randomsample.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 10 21:43:57 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a7849-0005DL-Hl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 21:43:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44415 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a7849-0003VM-0G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:43:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44044) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a7843-0003T3-Sp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:43:48 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a7843-0002zK-3r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:43:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout26.012.net.il ([80.179.55.182]:33339) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a783y-0002yR-Ip; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:43:42 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout26.012.net.il by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NZ500D00TIAUX00@mtaout26.012.net.il>; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 22:46:10 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NZ5003DBTOXL690@mtaout26.012.net.il>; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 22:46:10 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <877fkmt694.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:196063 Archived-At: > From: David Kastrup > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, deng@randomsample.de, perry@piermont.com > Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 21:09:59 +0100 >=20 > C-n runs the command next-line (found in global-map), which is = an > interactive compiled Lisp function in =E2=80=98simple.el=E2= =80=99. >=20 > This function is for interactive use only; > in Lisp code use =E2=80=98forward-line=E2=80=99 instead. >=20 > There is a reason this function is for interactive use only. And > replaying a keyboard macro is not interactive. >=20 > If the variable =E2=80=98line-move-visual=E2=80=99 is non-nil, = this command moves > by display lines. Otherwise, it moves by buffer lines, without > taking variable-width characters or continued lines into accoun= t. >=20 > And this is _exactly_ why line-move-visual should be nil during mac= ro > recording/replay because otherwise _no_ _useful_ behavior for > non-interactive use results. But then recording a macro and replaying it will do different things, no?