From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Removal of unexec support from glibc malloc Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 18:04:11 +0200 Message-ID: <834me9d090.fsf@gnu.org> References: <569CDB81.6040600@redhat.com> <569D6B1E.6020002@emvision.com> <569D8E0B.1010603@yandex.ru> <569D9539.5040007@emvision.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1453219480 30696 80.91.229.3 (19 Jan 2016 16:04:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 16:04:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Ali Bahrami Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 19 17:04:33 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aLYlk-0005wy-FT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 17:04:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37707 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aLYlj-0006m2-VQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 11:04:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38644) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aLYlP-0006df-Ca for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 11:04:16 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aLYlH-0007oB-1T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 11:04:11 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:60782) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aLYlG-0007o6-VQ; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 11:04:02 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2065 helo=HOME-C4E4A596F7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aLYlG-0001Pv-1k; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 11:04:02 -0500 In-reply-to: <569D9539.5040007@emvision.com> (message from Ali Bahrami on Mon, 18 Jan 2016 18:45:29 -0700) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:198363 Archived-At: > From: Ali Bahrami > Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 18:45:29 -0700 > > I just did that here, and my temacs -Q time is roughly > the same as yours. I wonder how much of that is simply finding > the files, opening them, and pulling in the bytes, and how > much is emacs loading those bytes into its internal data > structures? We pre-load around 110 files, totaling about 4.5MB into temacs, so I very much doubt that these 5 sec could be mostly I/O, as 50 msec per a 40 KB file is way too much for just I/O.