From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Processed: Re: bug#19717: 24.4.50; printing.el still uses ps-eval-switch Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 20:41:51 +0300 Message-ID: <834m9o659c.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83oa7x5wpc.fsf@gnu.org> <83k2ik68h2.fsf@gnu.org> <83bn3w675o.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1464025514 6260 80.91.229.3 (23 May 2016 17:45:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 17:45:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rgm@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 23 19:45:07 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b4tub-0000es-JP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 May 2016 19:45:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49604 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b4tua-000509-Qr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 May 2016 13:45:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48150) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b4trw-0002dd-HO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2016 13:42:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b4trs-00025D-CO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2016 13:42:20 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:46063) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b4trs-000257-8m; Mon, 23 May 2016 13:42:16 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3447 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1b4tro-0002UR-7e; Mon, 23 May 2016 13:42:14 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Paul Eggert on Mon, 23 May 2016 10:32:08 -0700) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:203967 Archived-At: > Cc: rgm@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Paul Eggert > Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 10:32:08 -0700 > > On 05/23/2016 10:00 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > IME, the bug is still listed as blocking long after it was closed, no > > matter how many times I refresh the browser page. But when I send the > > control message to the tracker that unblocks it, the next refresh of > > the browser updates the display by removing that bug. > > Weird, that's not my experience: if I close a blocking bug, wait for a > bit (to make sure my bug-close email has hit the debbugs server), and > hard-refresh , the > blocking bug is no longer listed as a blocker. > > I hard-refresh by using Firefox. I hold down the shift key, and press on > the cycle icon at the right of the main URL. My point is that no such hard-refresh (about whose existence I didn't even know) is needed when I send the control command to the tracker to remove a big from the blocking list. > Perhaps the next time you close a blocking bug B, you might try looking > at B's page first and waiting until it's marked "done", and then try > refreshing Bug#19759. That's what I did. The bug was "done", but refereshing the 19759 page didn't remove it. When I sent the control message, it was removed on the next refresh a few minutes later.