From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: unexmacosx.c and limits.h problem Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 15:41:52 +0300 Message-ID: <834m5e4s1b.fsf@gnu.org> References: <17A5977B-7474-4740-BEC7-CFF27E57FC73@play-bow.org> <83d1k24vvr.fsf@gnu.org> <83a8f64udh.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1474116127 726 195.159.176.226 (17 Sep 2016 12:42:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 12:42:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: halley@play-bow.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Richard Copley Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 17 14:42:03 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1blEwU-0007wM-UH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 14:42:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46085 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1blEwT-0007X0-6d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 08:42:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39501) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1blEwK-0007V8-Ob for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 08:41:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1blEwG-0001hX-Jc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 08:41:51 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:51461) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1blEwG-0001h1-G0; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 08:41:48 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1668 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1blEwD-0002TB-EI; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 08:41:47 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Richard Copley on Sat, 17 Sep 2016 13:28:05 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207484 Archived-At: > From: Richard Copley > Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 13:28:05 +0100 > Cc: Paul Eggert , Bob Halley , > Emacs Development > > My preprocessed file doesn't show the #include or #define directives. > It sounds like yours does. Apparently another difference between our > toolchains. I obtained the preprocessed file the same way you did. No, there's no difference. The inclusion evidence is like this: # 1 "../lib/limits.h" 1 3 Do you see such a line in the preprocessed file? If you do, then does it include this line further down: #define LLONG_WIDTH _GL_INTEGER_WIDTH (LLONG_MIN, LLONG_MAX) I then searched back for _GNU_SOURCE and saw this: #define _GNU_SOURCE 1 and a little ways above it I saw this: # 1583 "./config.h" Do you see these? Etc. etc. -- just go back and look whether the file inclusion I described happens on your system. > I suppose the preprocessed source is no use to you, since you don't > have the same headers unless you update your MSYS, and if you do that > you won't need anything from me. If you cannot figure this out, send the preprocessed source of w32proc.c, sure. I will take a look. Thanks.