From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Sandbox subr-x? (was: `thunk-let'?) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 09:57:02 +0200 Message-ID: <834lq2r2gh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87infp9z6j.fsf@web.de> <87zi90eehg.fsf@web.de> <87o9ocd6s4.fsf@web.de> <83zi7wr6jc.fsf@gnu.org> <87k1z0csxa.fsf_-_@web.de> <83k1yzqshk.fsf@gnu.org> <87vaijwclj.fsf@web.de> <8ae533ea-f8fe-4b65-a6cc-8ce332d94d22@default> <87efp7vyny.fsf_-_@web.de> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1510300633 2961 195.159.176.226 (10 Nov 2017 07:57:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 07:57:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cpitclaudel@gmail.com, drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 10 08:57:09 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eD4BZ-0000UF-3z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 08:57:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40554 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eD4Be-00089X-Vz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 02:57:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44693) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eD4BY-00089P-Bs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 02:57:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eD4BV-00058p-AX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 02:57:08 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:50389) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eD4BV-00058l-7h; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 02:57:05 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3527 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1eD4BU-0003Nh-8T; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 02:57:04 -0500 In-reply-to: <87efp7vyny.fsf_-_@web.de> (message from Michael Heerdegen on Fri, 10 Nov 2017 00:07:45 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:220018 Archived-At: > From: Michael Heerdegen > Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 00:07:45 +0100 > Cc: Clément Pit-Claudel , > emacs-devel@gnu.org > > But maybe subr-x is also a symptom of limited manpower: if we had hordes > of people volunteering writing and updating documentation, we would > probably be less reluctant to fully integrate and document this stuff in > the first place. No, I don't think this is the reason. We are lately trying to accompany every change with the appropriate documentation, and we are doing quite well, AFAICT, limited manpower notwithstanding.