From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: set-frame-parameter a child-frame's 'parent-frame error on macOS ? Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 18:31:49 +0200 Message-ID: <834lnd26tm.fsf@gnu.org> References: <3341a4c3.36ca.160e851bdbd.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> <5A5876A3.10402@gmx.at> <87fu7b6zsj.fsf@163.com> <5A5902D9.9070801@gmx.at> <16191b19.1392.160ed773bef.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> <5A59C872.1010900@gmx.at> <87tvvqxcxr.fsf@163.com> <5A59F476.1060806@gmx.at> <87mv1hcnw8.fsf@163.com> <5A5B1D46.6000608@gmx.at> <731a3868-e589-978b-ee34-ab72cf5c5aff@yandex.ru> <4d250ebc-7979-3229-b9ea-6e57089d02df@yandex.ru> <5A5C76AC.60308@gmx.at> <53c55d98-dbf6-7e6d-eaa5-66e565f93581@yandex.ru> <87d12agitl.fsf@gmail.com> <87k1wakv1d.fsf@gmail.com> <83efmhrigt.fsf@gnu.org> <87wp09j2jp.fsf@gmail.com> <83a7x5rhq0.fsf@gnu.org> <87shaxj1xc.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1516638623 13492 195.159.176.226 (22 Jan 2018 16:30:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 16:30:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 22 17:30:19 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1edez7-0002wy-NY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 17:30:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51580 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1edf17-0000QJ-UM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 11:32:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58442) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1edf0x-0000PM-9H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 11:32:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1edf0t-0002OZ-A7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 11:32:07 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:39010) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1edf0t-0002OO-7A; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 11:32:03 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3366 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1edf0s-0007y2-CU; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 11:32:02 -0500 In-reply-to: <87shaxj1xc.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Robert Pluim on Mon, 22 Jan 2018 17:25:35 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:222146 Archived-At: > From: Robert Pluim > Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 17:25:35 +0100 > > >> Because we've been dragging our heels on fixing HiDPI issues for ages, > >> and if we don't fix the ones we know about for emacs-26 we'll have > >> another multi-year wait (and HiDPI displays are becoming more and more > >> common). > > > > OTOH, if we continue installing non-trivial patches on the release > > branch, we will not release Emacs 26.1 any time soon. Which one is > > worse? > > These two patches are not utterly trivial, but they're hardly complex > either (and they fix real bugs). > > > We must draw the line somewhere, but where is that? > > In my opinion, the other side of these two fixes. Opinions will vary. > [1] What do others think? > [1] Biased in favour of my own patches? Me!? Of course not.