From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: A couple of questions and concerns about Emacs network security Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2018 14:35:45 +0300 Message-ID: <834lhbjn1q.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20180705093346.071e6970@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <83wou9n66t.fsf@gnu.org> <20180705112920.076265d5@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <83r2khms1j.fsf@gnu.org> <895f8d54-aa4b-a735-19ac-2ffde88b61eb@cs.ucla.edu> <83muv5mq6b.fsf@gnu.org> <837em8l117.fsf@gnu.org> <81b4c3e4-6049-10b7-e4db-64ebaeba10f8@cs.ucla.edu> <83y3enjzle.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1530963270 9757 195.159.176.226 (7 Jul 2018 11:34:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2018 11:34:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: larsi@gnus.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, perry@piermont.com To: Jimmy Yuen Ho Wong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 07 13:34:25 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fblTt-0002Nj-KC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2018 13:34:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33201 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fblVz-0008C2-3q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2018 07:36:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49049) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fblVJ-0008Bf-WB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2018 07:35:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fblVE-0005U3-VS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2018 07:35:54 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:51833) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fblVE-0005Tw-Rm; Sat, 07 Jul 2018 07:35:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1540 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1fblV7-0000Io-Et; Sat, 07 Jul 2018 07:35:41 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Jimmy Yuen Ho Wong on Sat, 7 Jul 2018 11:30:54 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:227049 Archived-At: > From: Jimmy Yuen Ho Wong > Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2018 11:30:54 +0100 > Cc: Paul Eggert , "Perry E. Metzger" , > Lars Ingebrigtsen , rms@gnu.org, Emacs-Devel devel > > I keep hearing we are doing more than the browsers, but that's not > straightly comparible. > [...] > Basically, all of the checks are tailors to Emacs' multiple network > security levels and GnuTLS version changes. They take inspirations > from browsers but they are not a direct copy. That's what I meant, thanks for expressing that more accurately, and sorry for any potential confusion I could cause with my inaccurate wording.