From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [SOLVED] (was: very different start up for emacs master compared with 3 month ago) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 17:24:01 +0300 Message-ID: <834l2jsu4e.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87sgqanxxk.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <83blwy9vef.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvale3t6.fsf_-_@mat.ucm.es> <83o90trvf3.fsf@gnu.org> <83blwssxn0.fsf@gnu.org> <838srwscbk.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="64565"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: oub@mat.ucm.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "otadmor ." Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 14 16:24:23 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hxuCI-000Gcx-Sh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 16:24:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32820 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hxuCH-0007kV-QI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 10:24:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58802) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hxuCB-0007jC-Ko for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 10:24:13 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:56907) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hxuCB-0004Df-1W; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 10:24:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4990 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hxuCA-0007wJ-CG; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 10:24:10 -0400 In-reply-to: (otadmor@gmail.com) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:239358 Archived-At: > From: "otadmor ." > Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 08:19:19 +0300 > Cc: oub@mat.ucm.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > I meant issues of emacs with Ofast. If some things are known to be broken on emacs with this. I'm not sure > gcc man will give notes on emacs. That option's downsides are not related specifically to Emacs. The option causes GCC to use optimizations that can produce invalid programs. I don't think anyone has tried it with Emacs, and for a very good reason: it is not intended for general purpose programs. I personally advise to stay away of it, except when building programs where you understand very well the floating-point numerical aspects of every single line of code.