From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 83587bb 1/2: Correctly cache sorted completions in icomplete--sorted-completions Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2019 22:33:14 +0200 Message-ID: <834kxmrfn9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20191225175851.21930.86980@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20191225175852.DE63E20997@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <83eewrq9zp.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="46700"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 26 21:33:47 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ikZpK-000C0T-AQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 21:33:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56532 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ikZpJ-0006PY-4K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 15:33:45 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45179) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ikZos-0005zb-PT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 15:33:19 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:48591) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ikZos-00077E-Lt; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 15:33:18 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1991 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ikZor-0000XW-Kl; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 15:33:18 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from =?utf-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= on Thu, 26 Dec 2019 17:31:25 +0000) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:243676 Archived-At: > From: João Távora > Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2019 17:31:25 +0000 > > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2019-12/msg00635.html > > > > and it definitely starts a new thread. > > That's the one I had in mind. It appears in the longer-running "Starting the > Emacs 27 release cycle" thread as a reply to Bastien's > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2019-12/msg00129.html > (as you can see by following the link your posted). That's the mailman archiving feature being too "smart". I didn't remove any Re from the subject, I wrote an entirely new message. It just happened to use the same Subject line as some previous discussion, so mailman decided they were the same thread. If you examine the mail headers of my message, you will see that it doesn't have the other messages in its References header, and no In Reply To, either. I hope the MUA you are using to read the mailing list is smarter than mailman. > Even though you removed the "Re:" from the subject, Gmail also hides it in the > same "conversation", so it doesn't stand out as a new thread. So you may wish to submit a bug report against Gmail for too naïve threading. > Maybe I should blame Gmail. I'm working on ditching it, or at least > the web client, > but can't seem to close the deal :-( Using any MUA we have in Emacs will produce much better results.