From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 18:31:17 +0200 Message-ID: <834kj31wyy.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83zh0y2jtu.fsf@gnu.org> <83o8hd2gzl.fsf@gnu.org> <83a6sv1yj2.fsf@gnu.org> <7240fd2c-729f-4685-fbc9-90f8c5e0af6d@yandex.ru> <837dnz1xsx.fsf@gnu.org> <7b39e854-a553-9d72-3f8c-2c0ec1b64285@yandex.ru> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="28744"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rms@gnu.org, bugs@gnu.support, ulm@gentoo.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, ams@gnu.org, arthur.miller@live.com To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 26 17:34:12 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l4RIC-0007PA-N2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 17:34:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39420 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l4RIB-0006jV-P8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 11:34:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51384) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l4RFZ-000553-2h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 11:31:30 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:54348) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l4RFW-0001dn-TU; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 11:31:27 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4625 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1l4RFC-0005yq-VW; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 11:31:07 -0500 In-Reply-To: <7b39e854-a553-9d72-3f8c-2c0ec1b64285@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Tue, 26 Jan 2021 18:14:31 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:263473 Archived-At: > Cc: rms@gnu.org, arthur.miller@live.com, ulm@gentoo.org, ams@gnu.org, > bugs@gnu.support, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 18:14:31 +0200 > > On 26.01.2021 18:13, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >>> There are several methods available for that, but the simplest one is > >>> to define new elements using the ones defined in the original schema. > >> Wouldn't that make it a derivative work? > > I don't know. What if it does? > > The original schema's license can impose restrictions on that. Does it, though? And if it does, how useful is such a schema?