From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 2ed2999: Improve documentation of new Xref options Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2021 15:28:11 +0300 Message-ID: <834kaxsxb8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20210905075953.20536.20920@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20210905075955.0F6B720A0A@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <6f1fcbee-1825-1219-88fb-e6f28d00ab4d@yandex.ru> <831r62tjf3.fsf@gnu.org> <0eaa7dc7-a3f2-5319-bf09-629f9949e416@yandex.ru> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29170"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 06 14:31:42 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mNDmo-0007R7-DG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 14:31:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58522 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mNDmm-0004XD-IJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 08:31:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46826) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mNDjM-0001Uh-Q7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 08:28:08 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38652) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mNDjM-0001Dt-5f; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 08:28:08 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2038 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mNDjL-0002RP-6r; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 08:28:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <0eaa7dc7-a3f2-5319-bf09-629f9949e416@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Mon, 6 Sep 2021 14:24:02 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:274119 Archived-At: > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 14:24:02 +0300 > > On 06.09.2021 07:30, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > What is the rationale for this strange partition between these two > > options? > > We've discussed it in the bug thread, haven't we? > > The existence of two options is more or less a direct result from one of > your responses. And Juri's. My responses were only about a separate boolean option for xref-find-references. AFAIU, that's not what you described, disregarding the "boolean" part. So, bottom line: which commands are affected by each option? E.g., what about the -other-window and -at-mouse etc. variants: I guess they are affected by the corresponding options? Also, what other commands are affected, in addition to the "families" of xref-find-definitions and xref-find-references? And what about stuff like dired-do-find-regexp-and-replace -- is that affected by any of these? Thanks.