From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] support for accessing CPU/core count (processor-count) Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 17:09:01 +0300 Message-ID: <834k9mqqrm.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87y270bazi.fsf@yahoo.com> <87sfx8b6ta.fsf@yahoo.com> <46728405-9441-4e3d-be5e-75e1bceaee70@gmail.com> <87h7doj7ku.fsf@gnus.org> <83v923pmtf.fsf@gnu.org> <87y26yfry0.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29820"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, ideasman42@gmail.com To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 12 16:17:30 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1maIav-0007W2-KQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 16:17:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48792 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1maIao-0007F8-86 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 10:17:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54090) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1maISs-0005F0-LF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 10:09:12 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40828) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1maISr-0006WQ-JP; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 10:09:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=4052 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1maISq-0008R7-Ig; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 10:09:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87y26yfry0.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Tue, 12 Oct 2021 12:39:03 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:276805 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: Stefan Monnier , ideasman42@gmail.com, > luangruo@yahoo.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, Paul Eggert > > Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 12:39:03 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> Why emacs-28? > >> This is purely a new feature, and I can't see any urgency that would > >> justify bypassing the general rule to only push bug fixes to emacs-28. > > > > 100% agreement. > > Me too. Would it make sense to revert it and reapply on master, or > would that just slow the release down even more? The latter, I think. It's too late to fix that, sorry. Especially as Paul installed quite a few more changes, and I have no idea whether they somehow assume that one.