From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: contributing to Emacs Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2023 20:13:08 +0300 Message-ID: <834jmwzsuz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83v8fnslfz.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8fnh1h2.fsf@web.de> <83mt0zs9rc.fsf@gnu.org> <0a968a4e1b267c0f15dd237e6ea12a709fc06d5e.camel@yandex.ru> <838rcisj7o.fsf@gnu.org> <6537fa5fa5c1fe8437ed99ee0988e35895f5a54b.camel@yandex.ru> <8423a35750d8d8e0437c7708f6b4d0bbdfdb7fe0.camel@yandex.ru> <87o7ldf7ky.fsf@web.de> <8cc19084ab18d0adb0f2cee4af14aa1b1d914a83.camel@yandex.ru> <87352p9izj.fsf@yahoo.com> <87pm5mvfgi.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <83v8fe1wcm.fsf@gnu.org> <87edm1uxze.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <83ttuxz4ne.fsf@gnu.org> <83fs6gzzqc.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35243"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: spwhitton@spwhitton.name, luangruo@yahoo.com, arne_bab@web.de, ams@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Konstantin Kharlamov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 24 19:13:44 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qD6pT-0008zv-WB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 19:13:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qD6ok-0007Lh-G7; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 13:12:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qD6oj-0007LI-37 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 13:12:57 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qD6oh-0004wn-MZ; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 13:12:55 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=5a16ac7eUZ3JisZa1fYoZPLeFRWQvFLVUbu0CREPi/M=; b=VERxmrZxyM9+6+AcV88j N1osSOpFzfeXiwVY6tdHhTz6ufV++qyoiq1vstTbGUAfNvTSKlsEH6jiVZ5ckoUZre6hsvD9g3gl8 kM6qM+7e4M7SyyXMSbOoSsZ/5E/g7bRU8fUJDm7RW+nLvl/LczASpMiw47HbFWKDkCwKQXrDasWtS c4izUWvdF16Zf8LYXQhJFgGw3VKbqN86gUyEGhPveWwY2FUD4/3e2rIPiquPPhiTS6+KPtUpovZw9 y6hLzt+AGWI8/YDnN0uEc1BFIR1VJhhZxKGpoCg0t0l65R0rfGJbF0N4JvqVkIriUrzWkMGJewnB2 25hng1b3rto3CQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qD6od-0004xo-UF; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 13:12:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Konstantin Kharlamov on Sat, 24 Jun 2023 19:17:34 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:307187 Archived-At: > From: Konstantin Kharlamov > Cc: spwhitton@spwhitton.name, luangruo@yahoo.com, arne_bab@web.de, > ams@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2023 19:17:34 +0300 > > > But even if you did understand my point, are you really going to tell > > me how to review patches?  Don't you think it's my decision, and not > > yours?  In the project of which you are the maintainer, you can define > > the procedures and the preferences as you see fit (and I will follow > > if I need to contribute, as I do, for example, with GDB, where they do > > want patch series), but you cannot force me use the procedures that > > you find convenient and natural in a project where I need to review so > > many patches each day. > > Neither I said how *you* should review patches. You seem to be out of context: > you previous email was a reply to Sean's one-sentence email that they is talking > about the wider ecosystem. And your next reply was not in Emacs-only context, > but instead you were explaining problems with the wider approach. And so my > explanation about code review practices is also in general. Then you did misunderstand, and if my wording somehow caused that, I apologize. I described the rationale for the preference of this project to have contributions submitted as a single patch.