From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs/etc/images/gud record-start.xpm record-st... [EMACS_23_1_RC] Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2009 15:35:03 +0300 Message-ID: <833a82mqko.fsf@gnu.org> References: <19069.1630.392420.48574@totara.tehura.co.nz> <83d476n1pm.fsf@gnu.org> <19069.21090.619045.22938@totara.tehura.co.nz> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1249734924 2827 80.91.229.12 (8 Aug 2009 12:35:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 12:35:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 08 14:35:17 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MZl8n-0005NQ-7N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2009 14:35:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41478 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MZl8m-0004wm-Ag for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2009 08:35:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MZl8f-0004wN-Sp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2009 08:35:09 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MZl8e-0004v6-47 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2009 08:35:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54713 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MZl8d-0004ux-Oj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2009 08:35:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout3.012.net.il ([84.95.2.7]:53925) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MZl8b-0007EI-U0; Sat, 08 Aug 2009 08:35:06 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout3.012.net.il by i_mtaout3.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KO200M005EI6Q00@i_mtaout3.012.net.il>; Sat, 08 Aug 2009 15:35:04 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.151.173]) by i_mtaout3.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KO2005C95MFEHF0@i_mtaout3.012.net.il>; Sat, 08 Aug 2009 15:35:04 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <19069.21090.619045.22938@totara.tehura.co.nz> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9.1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:113802 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 22:24:34 +1200 > Cc: rgm@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts) > > > Can we please rename them to something that doesn't have this problem, > > like recstart.xpm, recstop.xpm, rev-continue.xpm, etc.? > > Does rev-continue.xpm work with 8+3 DOS file names? I thought it meant the > basename had only 8 characters (rev-continue has 12?). No, the requirement is to have them _unique_ in the 8+3 characters. Thus, rev-continue.xpm gets truncated to rev-cont.xpm, and if no other file gets truncated to the same 8+3 name, it's fine. The DOS port of Emacs does not support images, so these files won't be used there, we just need to avoid problems when unpacking the tarball. But even if Emacs did use these files on DOS, the filesystem calls transparently truncate the file names to 8+3 limits, and will happily resolve rev-continue.xpm to an existing rev-cont.xpm. > I'm willing to do it and I would probably use the names in gud.el: > recstart, recstop, rnext, rnexti, rstep, rstepi, rfinish, rcont. > Are these okay? Yes, they are okay. Thanks.