From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CMake build anyone? Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 23:33:34 +0300 Message-ID: <8339v6aspt.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87aapfxyhc.fsf@telefonica.net> <87wrsjwijl.fsf@telefonica.net> <83mxtfb7uo.fsf@gnu.org> <874ofnw8j4.fsf@telefonica.net> <83hbjnaqli.fsf@gnu.org> <836302b21r.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1280176431 32067 80.91.229.12 (26 Jul 2010 20:33:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:33:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, schwab@linux-m68k.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 26 22:33:49 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OdUMu-00017E-WB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 22:33:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37714 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OdUMu-0006ex-Df for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:33:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37994 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OdUMi-0006bh-Ji for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:33:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OdUMh-000288-Fr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:33:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:52807) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OdUMh-000281-8w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:33:35 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L6600M00LDKKV00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 23:33:34 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.61.30]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L6600MD2MFW1F50@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 23:33:33 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:127847 Archived-At: > From: Juanma Barranquero > Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 22:19:26 +0200 > Cc: schwab@linux-m68k.org, ofv@wanadoo.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > Btw, we may need to require another non-standard (and not so small > > package) in the near future: Perl, since makeinfo was reimplemented as > > a Perl script, and that's what we will see in the next release of > > Texinfo. > > Funny. I consider much more onerous to force someone to install Perl* > just to make info files, than CMake to have a modern, sane build > system. It's not like I'm thrilled to see that. But since I stopped hacking makeinfo several years ago, I have no say in what the maintainers decide to do.