From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Feature freeze on October 1 Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 14:46:23 +0200 Message-ID: <833926i82o.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87ehlq9u86.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1348577210 25595 80.91.229.3 (25 Sep 2012 12:46:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:46:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@gnu.org, monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 25 14:46:55 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TGUXJ-0002sr-N1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 14:46:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58600 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGUXE-00019G-Dn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 08:46:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51758) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGUX8-00018w-Ad for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 08:46:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGUX2-0005bM-9L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 08:46:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:48877) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGUX0-0005Zl-4M; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 08:46:30 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MAW00400ONGV900@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 14:46:27 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MAW00405OTFVT10@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 14:46:27 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87ehlq9u86.fsf@gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:153531 Archived-At: > From: Kenichi Handa > Cc: cyd@gnu.org, monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 21:12:41 +0900 > > > And what about CHAR_STRING_ADVANCE_NO_UNIFY and > > STRING_CHAR_ADVANCE_NO_UNIFY? Should we remove them and use, > > respectively, CHAR_STRING_ADVANCE and STRING_CHAR_ADVANCE instead? > > Or do we want to leave all these in place for now, to keep > > the option of going back to using the unification in some > > cases? > > Ummm, how about doing this in coding.c and don't change the > callers. > > #define CHAR_STRING_ADVANCE_NO_UNIFY CHAR_STRING_ADVANCE > #define STRING_CHAR_ADVANCE_NO_UNIFY STRING_CHAR_ADVANCE > > Then we won't forget that callers expect non-unify versions. Done as trunk revision 110196. Thanks.