From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Note on e65c307 breaks font-height Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 19:33:06 +0300 Message-ID: <8337p43hkt.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5746D38F.4010203@gmx.at> <4cdc1b55-2fe2-2457-1115-33ff68a9a65d@cs.ucla.edu> <83eg8o3ktw.fsf@gnu.org> <1fef7fee-835b-b5f4-f69c-ebd4ac14251c@cs.ucla.edu> <8360u03jki.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1464280423 25021 80.91.229.3 (26 May 2016 16:33:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 16:33:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 26 18:33:38 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b5yE6-0007Th-I3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 May 2016 18:33:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39464 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b5yE5-00058Z-Nj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 May 2016 12:33:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57188) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b5yDZ-00058M-5L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 May 2016 12:33:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b5yDU-0002MN-Vu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 May 2016 12:33:04 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:40814) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b5yDU-0002LS-T0; Thu, 26 May 2016 12:33:00 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2452 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1b5yDT-0004se-05; Thu, 26 May 2016 12:32:59 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Paul Eggert on Thu, 26 May 2016 08:57:48 -0700) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:204050 Archived-At: > Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Paul Eggert > Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 08:57:48 -0700 > > On 05/26/2016 08:50 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > you do see the difference between the frame's font parameter and > > the font of the frame's default face, yes? > > Obviously they are different. > > That being said, I am by no means an expert in Emacs font internals nor > do I particularly want to be; I'm just trying to help fix a bug that > Martin considers important. If it's not an important bug after all, or > if I'm getting in the way of fixing it, I will (happily and gratefully > :-) move on to other things. I didn't say it wasn't important; I think it is.