From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) [Documentation fix still remaining] Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 12:39:01 +0300 Message-ID: <8337m1drnu.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83tweugeu9.fsf@gnu.org> <20160809163814.GD4893@acm.fritz.box> <83inv9hkjd.fsf@gnu.org> <83h9ashfgx.fsf@gnu.org> <831t1wharr.fsf@gnu.org> <83mvkaduh0.fsf@gnu.org> <20160819084526.GA1971@acm.fritz.box> <834m6hdsvs.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1471599584 29291 195.159.176.226 (19 Aug 2016 09:39:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 09:39:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: acm@muc.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 19 11:39:37 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bagH3-0007JR-F0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 11:39:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56413 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bagH0-0008Da-Nx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 05:39:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45241) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bagGT-0008DV-4P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 05:39:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bagGP-0005fC-4H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 05:39:01 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:44304) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bagGP-0005ew-1R; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 05:38:57 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4194 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bagGN-000721-Dn; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 05:38:55 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Fri, 19 Aug 2016 05:21:04 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:206665 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Alan Mackenzie , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 05:21:04 -0400 > > >> Somebody wanting to use b-c-f and reading that text is likely to conclude > >> that b-c-f is called for _every_ change, just as I did ~10 years ago. > > Then they will be wrong, because the text doesn't say so. > > I think we're talking about different notions of "every change". Exactly.