From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) [Documentation fix still remaining] Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 05:38:05 +0300 Message-ID: <8337llmzn6.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160811112951.GA2154@acm.fritz.box> <7e1478b6-cf00-fcbf-8c24-43bdaa57e2b6@dancol.org> <415d1cca-f32c-624e-a4be-9aadcf8a0f17@dancol.org> <83inujbpek.fsf@gnu.org> <20160830171222.GA6672@acm.fritz.box> <5857ab7e-e85c-c6ae-ba1a-b1337ae57f2c@dancol.org> <83fupmm9ul.fsf@gnu.org> <67e1e007-c944-b91e-6c4b-b06b51beddc1@dancol.org> <83bn0am91r.fsf@gnu.org> <83a8fum6wv.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1472611136 8870 195.159.176.226 (31 Aug 2016 02:38:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 02:38:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: acm@muc.de, dancol@dancol.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 31 04:38:53 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bevQP-0001V2-U7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 04:38:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51971 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bevQN-0006iy-Cx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 22:38:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47870) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bevPr-0006hP-8I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 22:38:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bevPm-0002so-75 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 22:38:14 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:35706) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bevPm-0002rt-3z; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 22:38:10 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2405 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bevPj-0004Vd-Ta; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 22:38:08 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Tue, 30 Aug 2016 17:46:49 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207014 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Daniel Colascione , acm@muc.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 17:46:49 -0400 > > For these reason, I think we should go with Daniel's wording, which only > irks Alan and hence rubs fewer people the wrong way. Another advantage > is that this should close this thread (I think we all know at this point > that Alan won't ever agree with what you and I would agree to, which is > why the discussion had died before Daniel came along). > > Please? No, sorry. My opinion on this weighs more. And please let's leave this alone, for as long as the code is as it is.