From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 19:52:13 +0300 Message-ID: <83377ljmiq.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1017454172.910810.1504618695244@mail.libero.it> <83mv66z66p.fsf@gnu.org> <102a4c21-c275-c73e-ec53-0d85975dc968@cs.ucla.edu> <83a825znuf.fsf@gnu.org> <831snhzkgw.fsf@gnu.org> <837ex9x7vf.fsf@gnu.org> <83tw0cwcle.fsf@gnu.org> <83h8wcw3td.fsf@gnu.org> <83377vx3d0.fsf@gnu.org> <83ingnq01t.fsf@gnu.org> <83fubrpxsv.fsf@gnu.org> <83r2v9masw.fsf@gnu.org> <83d16smj5o.fsf@gnu.org> <9b9bfa40-a248-ed77-6522-53fe73e55434@cs.ucla.edu> <83d16pjt4v.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1505667169 24373 195.159.176.226 (17 Sep 2017 16:52:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 16:52:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rcopley@gmail.com, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Fabrice Popineau Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 17 18:52:42 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dtcoD-00065H-Ko for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 18:52:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33035 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dtcoL-0008Jb-4v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 12:52:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33849) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dtcng-0008JF-Et for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 12:52:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dtcnb-00023Q-Qm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 12:52:08 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:55450) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dtcnb-00023L-Mi; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 12:52:03 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3746 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dtcnb-00039f-2f; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 12:52:03 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Fabrice Popineau on Sun, 17 Sep 2017 18:39:01 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:218413 Archived-At: > From: Fabrice Popineau > Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 18:39:01 +0200 > Cc: Paul Eggert , Richard Copley , > Emacs developers > > > Looks like a GCC bug. To work around it, please try CACHEABLE instead of > > volatile, to warn the reader that it's a compiler-bug workaround. Like this: > > > > struct handler *CACHEABLE c = handlerlist->nextfree; > > Richard, Fabrice -- could you try this, please? > > This one fixes the warnings in eval.c. Thanks, pushed to the emacs-26 branch.