From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CC Mode and electric-pair "problem". Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 18:18:40 +0300 Message-ID: <8336xkt967.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20180531123747.GA24752@ACM> <20180617201351.GA4580@ACM> <20180618103654.GA9771@ACM> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1529335018 6355 195.159.176.226 (18 Jun 2018 15:16:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 15:16:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: acm@muc.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org, tino.calancha@gmail.com, rgm@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 18 17:16:54 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fUvtl-0001XO-QE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 17:16:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35286 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fUvvt-0001Jt-2m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 11:19:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54106) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fUvvc-0001HI-HH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 11:18:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fUvvb-0006FP-Ik for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 11:18:48 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:40049) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fUvvV-0006D0-Pe; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 11:18:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4451 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1fUvvU-0002zv-QY; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 11:18:41 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from =?utf-8?B?Sm/Do28g?= =?utf-8?B?VMOhdm9yYQ==?= on Mon, 18 Jun 2018 14:24:39 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:226458 Archived-At: > From: João Távora > Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 14:24:39 +0100 > Cc: Glenn Morris , Emacs developers , > Tino Calancha > > > Yes. But it is the master branch, where not everything can be expected > > to work all the time. I think the main thing is, we're _going_ to fix > > this bug. > > Well, I respectfully and totally disagree. The reason we have automated > tests in Hydra is to catch unintentional breakage, not intentional > breakage. And, IIUC that test is the only one preventing a successful > "make check". Isn't there a way to mark a test as expected to fail?