From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bat-mode: Inconsistent fontification. Consider using font-lock-function-name-face Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 17:54:37 +0300 Message-ID: <8336h42ocy.fsf@gnu.org> References: <3668c95a-d8a0-1e31-c663-297ac684a8f1@secure.kjonigsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="196177"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jostein =?utf-8?Q?Kj=C3=B8nigsen?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 10 17:07:40 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i7hk3-000ov3-Rm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 17:07:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41182 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i7hk2-0004Wy-HJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 11:07:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55969) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i7hXK-0007d6-4L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 10:54:30 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:56672) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i7hXJ-0001YF-SE; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 10:54:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4394 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1i7hXJ-0006Ek-4R; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 10:54:29 -0400 In-reply-to: <3668c95a-d8a0-1e31-c663-297ac684a8f1@secure.kjonigsen.net> (message from Jostein =?utf-8?Q?Kj=C3=B8nigsen?= on Tue, 10 Sep 2019 06:29:58 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:239982 Archived-At: > From: Jostein Kjønigsen > Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 06:29:58 +0200 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Again, are there any objectively negative or adverse side-effects of adding more default-faces which authors > can use and users can customize? You mean, except requiring all the other major modes to implement it, including those outside the Emacs core? No other objections.