From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29) Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2019 19:03:22 +0300 Message-ID: <8336g741th.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1697CA97-B2E6-4202-B14D-99DCF93954FD@acm.org> <02405f0d-788f-1b87-0269-b06eb2d67ff8@cs.ucla.edu> <83zhif4nq6.fsf@gnu.org> <6cf4485e-3d94-ce92-6342-d83cdc7f95d7@cs.ucla.edu> <83k19j4fw3.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="216753"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: mattiase@acm.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 05 18:07:00 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iGma9-000uB7-Q4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Oct 2019 18:06:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57804 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iGma8-00035l-E6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Oct 2019 12:06:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47931) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iGmWr-0001US-Oi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Oct 2019 12:03:34 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42406) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iGmWr-0004Uh-Gr; Sat, 05 Oct 2019 12:03:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4206 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iGmWq-0001BY-UM; Sat, 05 Oct 2019 12:03:33 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Sat, 05 Oct 2019 11:20:24 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:240622 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Paul Eggert , mattiase@acm.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2019 11:20:24 -0400 > > > That's it. And I personally can see no confusion in the likes of > > "[-+]", whereas I did need to consult the manual to learn that "[+-]" > > is also right. So at least for me, the confusion worked the other way > > around. > > As discussed here a while back, putting `-` as the last char is actually > the only choice which always works (because it can't be the first char > when that first char has to be `]`), so I recommend to always put `-` as > the last char. That's unrelated. I was talking about modifying _existing_ code, not about writing new code.