From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: BIKESHED: completion faces Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2019 16:47:09 +0200 Message-ID: <8336ezg2vm.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83h83ignrz.fsf@gnu.org> <83ftj2gma8.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhhaxalt.fsf@gmail.com> <83bltpgffr.fsf@gnu.org> <83tv7gg9oz.fsf@gnu.org> <83r22kg8pa.fsf@gnu.org> <20191106205133.njij3ve7qqy7yh3q@Ergus> <83ftizg4nr.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="58540"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: spacibba@aol.com, dgutov@yandex.ru, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 07 15:48:28 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iSj5I-000F8W-4G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 15:48:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43672 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iSj5G-0000o4-IT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 09:48:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51343) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iSj4G-0000Rn-1l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 09:47:28 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:43427) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iSj4E-0008Ux-8V; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 09:47:23 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2925 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iSj4D-0001rB-Hs; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 09:47:22 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from =?utf-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= on Thu, 7 Nov 2019 14:28:55 +0000) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:241927 Archived-At: > From: João Távora > Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 14:28:55 +0000 > Cc: Ergus , emacs-devel , > Stefan Monnier , Dmitry Gutov > > > that radically changes some part of our UI. > > My proposal doesn't change the UI radically at all. > In fact it produces 0 changes to the UI that existed > before the introduction of flex. I wasn't talking about the changes which introduce zero changes in the UI.