From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Using incremental parsing in Emacs (via: emacs rendering comparisson between emacs23 and emacs26.3) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 17:09:46 +0300 Message-ID: <83369q3ped.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83o8sf3r7i.fsf@gnu.org> <364B2177-3E83-4230-A019-0BBD0F1151FB@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="41809"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: akrl@sdf.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 30 16:10:09 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jIv7B-000Alu-J9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 16:10:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50396 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jIv7A-0003wY-GY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 10:10:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53695) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jIv6g-0003Qs-0P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 10:09:38 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45067) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jIv6f-0007BM-MO; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 10:09:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4252 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jIv6e-0008KG-Kv; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 10:09:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Monnier on Mon, 30 Mar 2020 09:33:37 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:246009 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Andrea Corallo > Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 09:33:37 -0400 > > > What is "OS-and-architecture-neutral representation of the grammar" and how > > it is different from what tree-sitter uses now? > > I don't know, that's part of the question (well, I know what I mean by > an "OS-and-architecture-neutral representation", of course, > but I believe you also understand this concept). Actually, no, I don't. It was a serious question, I didn't understand what grammar representation you had in mind.