From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Confused by y-or-n-p Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2021 17:32:40 +0200 Message-ID: <8335ze2i93.fsf@gnu.org> References: <834kkcr1eo.fsf@gnu.org> <83im8qnyca.fsf@gnu.org> <83bleinmse.fsf@gnu.org> <56435592-d2d0-5fb6-977f-01e1931da835@gmx.at> <87k0t38g1z.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83czyvkts6.fsf@gnu.org> <87bleetirr.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87y2hhri3n.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83pn2tkfg8.fsf@gnu.org> <871rf7ippu.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83a6trg6mc.fsf@gnu.org> <83mtxqcauz.fsf@gnu.org> <83turva0y2.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23650"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, juri@linkov.net, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 06 16:36:27 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kxArL-00062g-A7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 16:36:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33216 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kxArK-0002nD-AR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 10:36:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36390) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kxAnr-0007Vm-SI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 10:32:51 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:34466) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kxAnq-0004bc-7Q; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 10:32:50 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4698 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kxAnh-0003OO-6d; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 10:32:42 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Gregory Heytings on Wed, 06 Jan 2021 09:41:09 +0000) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:262604 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2021 09:41:09 +0000 > From: Gregory Heytings > cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, rudalics@gmx.at, Eli Zaretskii , > rms@gnu.org, juri@linkov.net > > A rule is not a mathematical law, it's an action guideline. That's not the kind of "rule" we are discussing here, please re-read the thread from its beginning. I said long ago that I'm okay with a guideline (and we actually already have it and act on it). The proposed rule is very different: it says that if the announcement and the discussion didn't happen, the change cannot go in.