From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Consistent face for keys in *Help* and `substitute-command-keys' Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2021 09:33:26 +0200 Message-ID: <8335x8ybw9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87h7m5iagw.fsf@gnus.org> <83blc9tnvz.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2fcrzkt.fsf@gnu.org> <831rd4romg.fsf@gnu.org> <83zgzsq7xn.fsf@gnu.org> <83v9afriqp.fsf@gnu.org> <83zgzjhvdn.fsf@gnu.org> <83a6rhxwah.fsf@gnu.org> <837dmlxspt.fsf@gnu.org> <834khpxr0s.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20184"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 06 08:34:31 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lIRSJ-00059j-Ad for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 08:34:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54412 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lIRSI-0007fO-DA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 02:34:30 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44454) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lIRRV-0007Gk-HL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 02:33:41 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:34647) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lIRRT-0000qT-La; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 02:33:40 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2051 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lIRRS-0003XO-Tb; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 02:33:39 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Kangas on Fri, 5 Mar 2021 15:43:15 -0600) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266056 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 15:43:15 -0600 > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> The font size is different, yes. > > > > Do we want that to happen in tooltips? > > I think so, yes. If the user has specified :height and we otherwise > respect this face, then why shouldn't we respect also that? It makes the tooltip height larger than usual, doesn't it? If so, I think we should at least have that mentioned in the doc string of the face. > (But the use-case sounds a bit unusual to me, judging by the themes I've > seen: :height is usually changed only for headlines and the like, not > for "body" text.) It could be changed indirectly via the font.