From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 050b830 3/3: Do interactive mode tagging for finder.el Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 21:39:36 +0200 Message-ID: <8335wrdjbb.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83zgyzeezu.fsf@gnu.org> <87eegbo8db.fsf@gnus.org> <83v99nedze.fsf@gnu.org> <837dm3drum.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="19062"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 19 20:40:36 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lNKz5-0004rD-KG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 20:40:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60330 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lNKz4-0004kA-MO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 15:40:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39398) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lNKyC-0004J5-M3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 15:39:40 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41209) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lNKyC-00012z-6O; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 15:39:40 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3736 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lNKyB-0001xX-BM; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 15:39:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Kangas on Fri, 19 Mar 2021 12:08:00 -0500) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266614 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 12:08:00 -0500 > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> If the above is correct, then that also means that there is no point to > >> show such commands even in `finder-mode'. So it would be even better to > >> add some form that marks a command as only relevant to the mouse and > >> then never show those commands in `M-x'. ISTR we discussed something > >> like that but I'm not sure if we reached any conclusion. > > > > That's a separate issue. My point is that we shouldn't tag commands > > with a mode unless we are 110% sure this tagging is correct and cannot > > do any harm. If there's doubt, there's no doubt. > > Makes sense. I'll revert that part of the change. Thanks. > Should we take this opportunity to discuss the above, though? I think > it would be useful to have something like it. But I don't have any > great ideas for what it could look like. Sure, let's discuss. For starters, how about not showing in "M-x" completions any commands whose interactive spec expects a mouse event?