From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Gitlab Migration Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 22:08:52 +0300 Message-ID: <8335qur9h7.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87h7fcnmq0.fsf@posteo.net> <83tujbqg4j.fsf@gnu.org> <874kbbosht.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26124"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: philipk@posteo.net, larsi@gnus.org, danflscr@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Theodor Thornhill Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 27 21:10:29 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mJhFE-0006YJ-MV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 21:10:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37388 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJhFD-0003jI-Pc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 15:10:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42070) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJhE4-0002gQ-1D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 15:09:17 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:59808) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJhE0-0005Zr-9C; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 15:09:13 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4136 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJhDy-0007th-R9; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 15:09:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Theodor Thornhill on Fri, 27 Aug 2021 17:29:46 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:273177 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 17:29:46 +0200 > From: Theodor Thornhill > CC: Eli Zaretskii , Daniel Fleischer , > philipk@posteo.net > > >There doesn't seem to be much movement on getting GitLab to support the > >features we want, so perhaps we should take a closer look at SourceHut > >instead. Has anybody here done an evaluation of SourceHut to see > >whether it'd fit our requirements? > > > > We actually discussed it on this list with its creator, Drew DeVault last year: > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2020-09/msg00534.html That was almost a year ago, and the discussion is thin on actual details. Support for email-based workflow is a good start, and is one of the main requirements, but what about the GitLab/Github-like features? if they are missing or incomplete, we will be trading debbugs for something that is basically the same beast in a different wrapping. And what about the other requirements we collected and documented in the GitLab issue about this? So, like Lars, I think it would help if someone could post an evaluation of SourceHut vs what we'd like to see, using the GitLab issue as the baseline. TIA