From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master ff4de1b: Fix quoting style in Lisp comments Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 15:09:52 +0300 Message-ID: <8335q38ktr.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20210912165141.9491.52637@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20210912165143.5BC1E20A5E@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <47d6e9a6-f334-eda9-2e08-0a946e51fc4a@yandex.ru> <83v934emk7.fsf@gnu.org> <87sfy8d7oo.fsf@gnus.org> <9194fc93-fb9c-000f-a35a-321ddd259893@gmx.at> <8735q5yi63.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83czp9by3s.fsf@gnu.org> <05cbffe0-f89b-ff54-64f5-cd1d11bac4f5@yandex.ru> <831r5pbt7j.fsf@gnu.org> <83wnnhacy4.fsf@gnu.org> <40937e22-994f-466c-87be-4f70a522118a@yandex.ru> <83pmt790cz.fsf@gnu.org> <41b90a60-04ab-8ef1-24ee-ac30d39640aa@yandex.ru> <837dff8niq.fsf@gnu.org> <8a9a14b9-c562-8813-daea-28108f3173f3@yandex.ru> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7808"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rms@gnu.org, stefan@marxist.se, juri@linkov.net, rudalics@gmx.at, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 17 14:11:25 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mRCiD-0001qX-Rz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 14:11:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39862 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mRCiB-0005Gu-Fa for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 08:11:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36330) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mRChV-0004Zt-DV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 08:10:41 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52184) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mRChR-0008UQ-Fp; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 08:10:37 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2151 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mRCh0-00049I-Nv; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 08:10:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: <8a9a14b9-c562-8813-daea-28108f3173f3@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Fri, 17 Sep 2021 14:25:31 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:274859 Archived-At: > Cc: rms@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, stefan@marxist.se, > juri@linkov.net, rudalics@gmx.at, larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 14:25:31 +0300 > > > How many are "en masse"? We have less than a dozen people claiming > > they want `..' back, that's hardly a "masse" in my book. > > I don't see anybody concur with your stance in this particular > discussion, and if you search the old one, I think it was mostly Paul > (?), and even he was really arguing toward something different, in a > different context as well (plain text files). It doesn't matter. This is a decision we already made, so just saying you don't like it is not good enough. We need a much stronger reason to reverse previous decisions. > > This one isn't, because we have been using it for many moons now. > > Some of it is practically impossible to undo, because it's in Git > > commit log messages. > > Again, look at this discussion: nobody is disputing the format of log > messages. Not true. If you look at the commit log messages, even the latest ones done today, you will see that almost everyone disputes that part. > Lars said we shouldn't care about it too much, but that's neither here > nor there. Which is a clear disagreement with what I said, and contradicts what you say above.