From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tick Reduction Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 21:00:31 +0200 Message-ID: <8335nl8jlc.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87bl2hyzca.fsf@gnus.org> <878rxhjlot.fsf@gnus.org> <874k85jlmq.fsf@gnus.org> <87v90khaa8.fsf@gnus.org> <83zgpwp7v2.fsf@gnu.org> <87tug4fdn7.fsf@gnus.org> <83pmqsp0m7.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0gzyy8k.fsf@gnus.org> <835ysjoupv.fsf@gnu.org> <8735nnyob1.fsf@gnus.org> <83y25fneeh.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmqrx7rh.fsf@gnus.org> <83tug3ndaj.fsf@gnu.org> <874k81vmlf.fsf@gnus.org> <83sfvl8wjw.fsf@gnu.org> <87o869y0v2.fsf@gnus.org> <83fsrl8owz.fsf@gnu.org> <87o869wkcx.fsf@gnus.org> <83bl298n9b.fsf@gnu.org> <8735nlwih6.fsf@gnus.org> <837dcx8kkn.fsf@gnu.org> <87lf1dv1fi.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38831"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, stefankangas@gmail.com, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 24 20:04:32 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mpxZI-0009s4-1y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 20:04:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36880 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mpxZG-00085o-6M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 14:04:30 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55104) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mpxVQ-0007Ye-N8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 14:00:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=43784 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mpxVQ-0005g4-Dt; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 14:00:32 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=HxzhAP+HLYoHsREizjXb0WnFwEaL55i/htzHk5GjG+k=; b=HPiV5DTBRT1M hdaOUBG7RbdjaWeWSKyKltUVJdzmx1SWeuF9fqlF9kANvoDPPcFXa5+XHgCFyUdEjnzMkZ+oab65P s3670GbwIR3mDkVfmQLKrxi/3kt+3HlBKivynqSbaDbAKSgYPHvrLoOaAIG8aokWDqIv31vuUCZfA f9oU/UWeSk85gTuor0fY+5X9TX96WduRiNGIOS43LJt35FPw9d6tDu+SyRM/+UNW1z/aUWNkJtrCm fmdfudVh7ijNJIv30Tnnm5tVd0pYyZZoKbP60OnCgqoe/rQy+ETRJ8/3n7k3F22LzzdQols4YdMCz JXmV3qawo4yJDzRrTfhFRQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=1320 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mpxVQ-0001cG-1l; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 14:00:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87lf1dv1fi.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Wed, 24 Nov 2021 19:44:17 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:280042 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: dgutov@yandex.ru, stefankangas@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 19:44:17 +0100 > > > You cannot usefully have two display properties with different values > > (one min-width, the other height) which overlap. > > Sure you can: There's no min-width in this counter-example, so how does it contradict what I said? 'height and 'raise make sense when combined in the way you did (i.e. one completely nested inside the other), but what would be the sense of 'min-width and 'height that partially overlap? But let me be more precise: you cannot usefully have overlapping display properties for any arbitrary combination of property values. It can work for some combination, but won't work for most of them.