From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Correct byte compiler error/warning positions. The solution! Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 14:45:01 +0200 Message-ID: <8335nfw2pe.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83pmqm16vz.fsf@gnu.org> <8335nh29pt.fsf@gnu.org> <83wnktzxb2.fsf@gnu.org> <83ilwcyc6o.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13126"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 29 13:46:53 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mrg3Y-0003AH-9D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 13:46:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50142 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mrg3W-0000vQ-Jp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 07:46:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55006) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mrg1e-0008Je-72 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 07:44:54 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=40194 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mrg1d-0007Mf-R5; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 07:44:53 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=1WiPe8uR50bXQDQ7Ug9qNrJOyZ9AqqQHJYiFN7V+dwg=; b=GYOO+01o3CQr gqFklkI3Q2isMMldxBtB61wMdlCp6aUXpACqp1dl5EdVIR3udEnyPa5XwQ0yY0sbbvHvEsk6YKjmP ifh+mClC3pYGwHi+hLZSzWPG/CtnSNp+Yg3dufK9CC7FkPVPUn3xreJbpqVzJJr/iNInNMoGGCYx/ kbv5TypyfekhiwUU/oQyqnOkZwCuez8jyQ1CBAPp+TgP+VEqXPoqvTZSEILO3DdAJB8IEOM9/sHbj ZgP2yFxjXAUa0GBfl9hEEqQLwnXa0l+bVDeyaZMIG7NJIKeIccYk/6w/0x7cMGY06nFno7z7zz2km tFYQ/BOg8qsgoeEK2tUVQQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=1635 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mrg1d-0002k3-Ij; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 07:44:53 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Alan Mackenzie on Mon, 29 Nov 2021 11:50:19 +0000) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:280463 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 11:50:19 +0000 > From: Alan Mackenzie > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Anyhow, I've committed the current state in the new branch > scratch/correct-warning-pos. It should build and run OK, although I > haven't tried it out with native compilation, yet. It is marginally > slower than master. Maybe we can merge it into master some time for > Emacs 29. Please show the benchmark results, so we could know how slower is this. Thanks.