From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-28 64ea1a1: Fix eshell for systems that do not have subprocesses Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2021 12:07:09 +0200 Message-ID: <8335myp25u.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20211212075134.13255.37107@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20211212075136.10D6020A0A@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87ee6iyxot.fsf@yahoo.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14886"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: stefankangas@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 12 11:11:03 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mwLot-0003jE-1d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 12 Dec 2021 11:11:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35826 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mwLor-0003v1-Qy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 12 Dec 2021 05:11:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37526) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mwLlL-0001w7-Dj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Dec 2021 05:07:23 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=55924 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mwLlL-0005ej-51; Sun, 12 Dec 2021 05:07:23 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=hmjz+8b2XaSfBIUvneNmjkYKKWLI4tilZVl7fohutNQ=; b=bzKETq9EzHdo ag4WhqclyXRHy6IgAlsblB/3PGa9aw5aklEHf6zK0meHC+YSnC4ZzCXCBE02Dtg5V05aCNlfkAncM Pl9ZJciBbL8xTSGs8Q9ypvKYCrlzpYFVr1AzUWLFuGjOOJ9pvHTjVCKVItqg3AtGf4hNMWCIwVlx9 nJraSyxh/AOdifZQWGsACZzhptWPdjC4+qnPTR0JsDQpKW1iHXMVTD3AUJ2FDyc5wRjmZ6vkmKvoy mEMFPL6nAFCioEoWED6P0YejqbTy/wnSWfpma9RxjJOk+48TcYV/0vOcgQPTUmdbzKQbCJw9Mp0Kb 1UJ1UdTn78MvjX90MudNQQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3316 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mwLlF-00008Z-Q4; Sun, 12 Dec 2021 05:07:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87ee6iyxot.fsf@yahoo.com> (message from Po Lu on Sun, 12 Dec 2021 17:33:38 +0800) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:281784 Archived-At: > From: Po Lu > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2021 17:33:38 +0800 > > Stefan Kangas writes: > > > Is this relevant only to MS-DOS? If yes, should we add a comment to > > that effect to `eshell-processp'? > > If MS-DOS is the only system that doesn't have `processp', then yes. Yes, that's true nowadays.