From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: New ELPA package ada-lite
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 15:04:01 +0300
Message-ID: <8335dvdqku.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <86y1vpfl1k.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
 <jwvsflx2ww2.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <83fshwhqkw.fsf@gnu.org>
 <86o7wjfb11.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="25641"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 17 14:13:13 2022
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1oOHv6-0006WB-Jm
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 14:13:12 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52260 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1oOHv5-0006QH-8l
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 08:13:11 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42064)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1oOHmN-0001F2-Kj
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 08:04:11 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:36548)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1oOHmM-0000Xs-Te; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 08:04:10 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date:
 mime-version; bh=5PnBKYn7OIp6iEcgkzvYzxjwsn6Zrq2Hh6069kAdVEU=; b=pGiMU/PhjovH
 wrtO4sKsgcHHYvlFK5FMVgIrnjzr2xou+T1dO47UFwAfFnoNfTP6iTLGq4QjKNE5Yay/w2fugPVw4
 Kx4wCKD0lbHbxO5RabhouxyPQtVr8dixTVc5P4pjxo255XdExbqUemhKd5cEQAW8bU4gtbE5O3OCT
 R3MRTfU4/ZFgTTgJWQS8Guxs03AjuG+Cp86p5JmuN0wQAZY2nuolTmiuhSg9SVWzd+eernudjbjSD
 ZcI+6s7gmTXw7BFcN0ly0SimMVqFGfrMxeiaHv469j1bWUKbhIS7k2PQlO7C7fSr0It9TA++pmXmZ
 UQEU9rzTWlEzKjlmii9YZA==;
Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=1797 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1oOHmM-0002yn-C8; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 08:04:10 -0400
In-Reply-To: <86o7wjfb11.fsf@stephe-leake.org> (message from Stephen Leake on
 Wed, 17 Aug 2022 02:56:58 -0700)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:293551
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/293551>

> From: Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org>
> Cc: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 02:56:58 -0700
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> > Would it make sense to have the lite mode in core?
> 
> I don't think so; that would mean any use of ada-mode would cause a
> conflict in auto-mode-alist.

Why would they conflict?  Or, IOW, why wouldn't it be possible to make
them not conflict, assuming that no one will activate both modes in
the same buffer?