From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Renaming eglot -- or at least add an alias? Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2022 19:28:26 +0300 Message-ID: <8335c4zxat.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83pmfdduix.fsf@gnu.org> <83sfk7c1kh.fsf@gnu.org> <87sfk7woc1.fsf@posteo.net> <837d1jblk7.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5698"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: philipk@posteo.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 03 18:41:37 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ofOVd-0001Ms-D8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2022 18:41:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57778 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ofOVb-0002C4-WF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2022 12:41:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54022) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ofOJ1-0003PA-VK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2022 12:28:35 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:60656) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ofOJ0-00011U-LQ; Mon, 03 Oct 2022 12:28:34 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=/NMVVt90QZrQJdQlft0XEaNvbrsowEs5vcK76IMg7Ds=; b=l1gooRkAr3a+ y01jS8754U4xe/A+TTm/AunCvV5W+gzUU37uuetDJT/4aE0q4/lrg5e/I8I2ARWJO1Gsno91OMq6H MIbYAqwBTKNsj+jhXCXmjpJNgPi8NPY5lGUeUS8Syv6WMwxOHH04KMHT/bz9xpP66nsRDtzHUDT+8 IO3XWfKQJDzY4ru1q2RIzYKju70j5QrHUT2PnbLlu1nWSNKlmNKolEwzycJd3ujSsxl+fueIUjitF Li90Kh+c0pXiZRGxz7vPOKuYQqpboHmvRvjLV9KjTDWCModO9jtGUFuNfaa/EA5odXKD2IV1SzeVS 8DyHEF7Pqi1NXf4bdDl3Ow==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=1217 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ofOIy-000758-4a; Mon, 03 Oct 2022 12:28:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Richard Stallman on Sun, 02 Oct 2022 21:06:01 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:296764 Archived-At: > From: Richard Stallman > Cc: philipk@posteo.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2022 21:06:01 -0400 > > > The deadline is that we want to have Eglot in Emacs 29, and the > > release branch is expected in late November. > > Isn't that up to us? If we make this branch in January, that wait > would not be a problem. It's up to us, but I would like to make a good-faith effort to keep the deadline. Otherwise, why make a decision if we back up on it at the first opportunity? > It is good to make a plan, but there is no need to be rigid about it. > When we have a choice to make, that would be hard to change later, > it's worth delaying so as to make the eight choice. I'd like to reserve delay decisions for serious problems. My experience is that if we allow the deadline to slip too easily, we will keep delaying it, and very quickly find ourself in August rather than January. And this problem is nowhere near being serious enough.