From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Help with debugging Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 19:53:53 +0300 Message-ID: <83355o95r2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8597902ce1e4e43b0e0285cb55fd76d6@posteo.de> <87y1nhw0lu.fsf@web.de> <62c90d107f39e858da29360c239f9651@posteo.de> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37253"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 28 18:54:50 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1phCav-0009Pm-EU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 18:54:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1phCa1-0005D0-Ba; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 12:53:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1phCZx-0005Ch-Ur for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 12:53:50 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1phCZx-0002i9-Cy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 12:53:49 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=HiuXvghe9FmS5G99j/jTyrLuQIyPL5DaglPrBycZI38=; b=SovZYzje71uQ YtQa2JELTZMhso1GVQpc4nkabDoihgbJN38Opmoj5oxmT23D+aTx5t/BcCtjibOzumWG5ojjjNUbe 58B4mvTayL/a7SXGrUz3kkv1pQjXGJ2CLIUCavrBcKkZA/NWCkyfgWyknSbN2YLGht5QScaUNIUNq kGWfq39TYKLDd+mG2YbqqHWzBz/tg6VHNVHFlhOlkfnD48y1JjgJyhXwssni84fD3fimIJhYhoh8P 7IWAn/EUy0Bf8MNXvfbaLCY/gTI4l51v8pee/wKJX1Sy0eVkSy4H4bNgY4IOiMMQbQbQhCkbdtbhz R1RXPeXeSeLfbL43JuFZ8g==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1phCZw-0007Iv-Pa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 12:53:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: <62c90d107f39e858da29360c239f9651@posteo.de> (c.buhtz@posteo.jp) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:304808 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 14:03:12 +0000 > From: c.buhtz@posteo.jp > > > Are we sure that this doesn't happen because the system is running out > > of RAM? > > Good idea. But Emacs 27 was running well on the same machine including > an open Thunderbird and XFCE desktop (via XRDP). > > Does Emacs 29 consume much more RAM then 27? It shouldn't, but if you built Emacs with native-compilation support, then it will fork additional Emacs processes to perform just-in-time native compilation, and that could consume more memory. > I'll have a closer look the next time. I suggest to look at the system's log, any programs killed because they've ran out of memory should be mentioned there.