From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is it better to add treesitter modes to core? Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 15:47:02 +0200 Message-ID: <8334v5nvvt.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a5phiap4.fsf@posteo.net> <7919cda7-a09e-498c-87e7-6a1733b0eeed@gutov.dev> <83zfxenv4g.fsf@gnu.org> <6d5f5fdc-2438-4de0-bc51-8f2cc4c0ca8d@gutov.dev> <99bd9988-5f36-41d3-a82e-7677dab7fe5b@gutov.dev> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27219"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: dmitry@gutov.dev, philipk@posteo.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org, stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 10 14:48:32 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rNYwZ-0006pd-OU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 14:48:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNYvn-0007F8-W9; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 08:47:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNYvl-0007Eo-4B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 08:47:41 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNYvh-0003jw-T0; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 08:47:38 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=/91oEIX5L1Evd4zoKiwlQZoazAsFqpp1+xwB1GPruxk=; b=ZuTHHRMF8KBG pYkHL4lGPmsIDTNvd9Fc4ifwdeuScs2wsf7EAOjl/kL8+9Vu8cwEglvlSgcSq13lfe+jsSHRReDDh gbntnF04x3OAz1aOF0ASbyUWiciARQx4AI/Tuhopm/bb8XS9Bs/YXBx+q0GyOVTLzkK9xxorVxXJD w9Sse/RFGTfQBbL0OHOVlcb+ctlfgiSHZxyQXGm0k9RoI/5gfRQgyzxJt0HernrGq1QRDUG7oUG8L tVgPfaxsjv47Nw5ZmrRR4+bVCuA61tZ2D0Jd+TJgoqb3Q9jM01aeO2qvaiHfkE4D8XbKoVQmLYvoi OEvWGHpYdAg7e2v8saS+eA==; In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Kangas on Wed, 10 Jan 2024 04:03:00 -0800) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:314814 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 04:03:00 -0800 > Cc: philipk@posteo.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org, stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org > > Dmitry Gutov writes: > > > etc-fstab-generic-mode starts to get used if I (require 'generic-x), > > however. > > IIUC, that's the expected behaviour. Yes. We don't activate modes in generic-x.el unless the user explicitly loads it.