From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Where / when Emacs on Gitlab? Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 11:15:57 +0200 Message-ID: <8334v4mdrm.fsf@gnu.org> References: Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="31429"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Psionic K Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 11 10:17:09 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rNrBV-0007v0-CG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 10:17:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNrAm-00078a-I2; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 04:16:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNrAe-00077h-Kw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 04:16:16 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNrAb-0000ca-Ut; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 04:16:14 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=/HYTFm8SLjY3+ge5TfymFgamNBNMIxY2RXWeQ0mDbc4=; b=ICYCQKllTggk 86gBtSySf7F8zqkaHltthXBhzmRJpDV+G6jHlt4NneSBcLQHnj8p2jUuKpZqGq7jt93+WOe0blAAE 0vBfBuiyfnvlq+Jh7EcDNJIbxlbNOc372Ay4kD46lrcWeJZaf7htlhkvC8Gb3h+fiOyxQcWyIySis 4aUdx/K5Lylg9dJWHmwQRUToOvoUVGzMX0gmrRB4J5W+dPAVU9lWJcCD5V2JiL2ypZuJZ8Xz50ECO iWaVewod8yV7RfcXFYHQGOu7XrvWudedir/Rzblg3PAwP9iGF+5Abk7pok7x1fJvWm4qZxN9PlxnS xspK/iizF2PN4FL0FS1ACQ==; In-Reply-To: (message from Psionic K on Thu, 11 Jan 2024 15:22:12 +0900) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:314844 Archived-At: > From: Psionic K > Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 15:22:12 +0900 > > I only just caught Stefan's presentation on Emacs development > https://toobnix.org/w/m4XmrmE9Geat54AKT1RQaH > > I'm in favor of a relief valve for the email based workflows and > generally experienced at these sorts of CI and repo automation tools. > Most importantly in this email, I don't lurk on the mailing lists, so > someone feel free to reply to me directly to make sure we connect on > Gitlab etc whenever it's ready to happen. Gitlab has issues, and at least some of them need to be resolved before we could switch. For the details, see https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/28152 Other similar tools and services were proposed over the years, but they all share the same problem: some aspects that we require are either absent or buggy or fall short of what we need. Past discussions concluded that there's no resistance to migrating to one of those tools/services as long as the minimum requirements are fulfilled. So for something like this to happen, motivated individuals should step forward and provide the missing features in some of these tools, at which point we could start the process of migrating to that tool.