From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Problems with xml-parse-string Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 17:04:31 +0200 Message-ID: <831v8lx1j4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87pqw6d7nz.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87zkvaiked.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87vd5ymptn.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87vd5x7ty2.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1285168331 27701 80.91.229.12 (22 Sep 2010 15:12:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:12:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 22 17:12:09 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OyQzP-0007KE-FQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 17:12:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39126 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OyQzO-0005jj-K4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:12:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53795 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OyQzC-0005dT-HV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:11:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OyQsx-0006xE-Ea for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:05:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:49474) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OyQsx-0006w5-70 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:05:27 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L9500D00LSZNK00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 17:04:28 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.203.3]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L9500DOLLVF5E70@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 17:04:28 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87vd5x7ty2.fsf@stupidchicken.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:130626 Archived-At: > From: Chong Yidong > Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 10:07:33 -0400 > > > Perhaps Stefan's idea of just naming the functions `libxml-parse-*' was > > the best to avoid the compatibility discussion. > > Having two xml parsers that provide slightly different outputs, even > though they do the exact same thing, is a problem regardless of what > their names are. 100% agreement.