From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 20:27:45 +0200 Message-ID: <831v84pk9q.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4CAA0FFC.5020809@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1286303274 23131 80.91.229.12 (5 Oct 2010 18:27:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 18:27:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Helmut Eller Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 05 20:27:52 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3CEx-00039s-SF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 20:27:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42835 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P3CEx-0003sx-7Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 14:27:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=45808 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P3CEr-0003rF-Ke for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 14:27:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P3CEp-0000pD-76 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 14:27:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:56158) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P3CEp-0000ou-0V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 14:27:43 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L9T00H00XW8I800@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 20:27:37 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.135.76]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L9T00GVOXXZPLA0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 20:27:36 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:131374 Archived-At: > From: Helmut Eller > Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 12:20:45 +0200 > > * Richard Stallman [2010-10-05 09:55] writes: > > > Meanwhile, there is a further issue. If we move these symbols into > > the standard Elisp, we need to document them in the Lisp Reference > > manual. We could certainly do that, with some work. But it would > > also make the Elisp manual bigger and more expensive. > > There is already a manual in doc/misc/cl.texi. Which is not part of the ELisp manual. Richard's concern is for the ELisp manual growing too large and too expensive, not with the need to write the relevant chapters.