From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Can anyone correct the Bazaar reference "revno:111954.1.97"? Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 05:35:25 +0200 Message-ID: <831tykt0n6.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20140301171337.53CC638073E@snark.thyrsus.com> <8338j1vkta.fsf@gnu.org> <87fvn17gbc.fsf@slice.rozzin.com> <83ppm5tfsg.fsf@gnu.org> <87ob1pywn7.fsf@slice.rozzin.com> <83k3ccts3p.fsf@gnu.org> <8738j0ihjn.fsf@igel.home> <83bnxotk5o.fsf@gnu.org> <87k3ccgvc6.fsf@igel.home> <8338j0tho7.fsf@gnu.org> <87fvn0gsed.fsf@igel.home> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1393817748 14813 80.91.229.3 (3 Mar 2014 03:35:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 03:35:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: esr@thyrsus.com, handa@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, rozzin@geekspace.com To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 03 04:35:56 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WKJfX-0007O1-LL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 04:35:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37599 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WKJfW-0005qs-NQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 22:35:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53983) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WKJfP-0005ql-Ng for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 22:35:52 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WKJfK-0001oF-Qm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 22:35:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout25.012.net.il ([80.179.55.181]:36465) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WKJfK-0001o4-Il; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 22:35:42 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout25.012.net.il by mtaout25.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N1U00K00BWVOE00@mtaout25.012.net.il>; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 05:34:00 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout25.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N1U00BEMCKOY190@mtaout25.012.net.il>; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 05:34:00 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87fvn0gsed.fsf@igel.home> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:170085 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: rozzin@geekspace.com, esr@thyrsus.com, handa@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 23:14:18 +0100 > > >> >> revno:111954.1.97 refers to revno:112051, not revno:111964.1.6. > >> > > >> > Maybe so, but how did you determine that? > > It cannot be the on the same branch, since it's not a plain number > (handa@gnu.org-20130320075820-0qzn1jnrqj0y2g4m is on the same branch). Yes, that's true. I thought Eric wanted the original commit, even if it was on another branch. But if he wants the corresponding trunk commit, then yes, you are right.