From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Redisplay problems? Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 19:22:39 +0200 Message-ID: <831txw944g.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87ppljg4ti.fsf@kanru-mozilla.corp.tpe1.mozilla.com> <5329C53B.3030008@gmx.at> <532ABA60.7000003@gmx.at> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=shift_jis Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1395336154 3552 80.91.229.3 (20 Mar 2014 17:22:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:22:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, christian@defun.dk, kanru@kanru.info, cloos@jhcloos.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 20 18:22:42 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WQgfv-0001gU-FH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 18:22:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48447 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WQgfu-0004MA-Q7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 13:22:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33477) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WQgfn-0004Lu-UH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 13:22:36 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WQgfj-0003q1-Mi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 13:22:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:51462) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WQgfj-0003po-F2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 13:22:27 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N2Q00C00W5N2X00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 19:22:26 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N2Q00BD6W9DMNC0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 19:22:26 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:170636 Archived-At: > From: Stefan > Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 10:01:17 -0400 > Cc: Christian Lynbech , James Cloos , > =09Kan-Ru Chen (=92=C2=8A=A4=94@) , > =09emacs-devel@gnu.org >=20 > > And of course, the frame's "garbaged" bit may not always be neede= d: if > > the frame was simply iconified+deiconified without any other chan= ge, > > there's no need to recompute matrices nor redraw anything, since = it's > > pretty much the same as obscuring the frame with another and then > > exposing it again. >=20 > I suggest the patch below for w32term.c. Guaranteed 100% untested,= of > course, Thanks. What bug does this fix?