From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Network security manager Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 21:22:46 +0200 Message-ID: <831tp09uux.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87sihg7r73.fsf@alrua-karlstad.karlstad.toke.dk> <87a93oilxl.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87oas4h555.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87a93oh180.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83h9xw9zg3.fsf@gnu.org> <83d28k9yb9.fsf@gnu.org> <837fys9wt7.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416338607 21737 80.91.229.3 (18 Nov 2014 19:23:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 19:23:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 18 20:23:20 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XqoMx-00082s-8S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 20:23:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54899 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqoMw-000661-S5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:23:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38366) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqoMe-0005zd-6V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:23:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqoMY-0006r3-D5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:23:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:45633) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqoMY-0006qu-5A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:22:54 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NF9006001SXJ300@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 21:22:52 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NF9005VT1U3XAA0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 21:22:52 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:177638 Archived-At: > From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 20:19:58 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen > >> Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 19:29:02 +0100 > >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > >> > >> There's a C variable called running_asynch_code, but it's not exposed to > >> Lisp. Unless there's something else in there that can be used, should > >> we just export that to Lisp, like the `noninteractive' variable? > > > > Why do you need that exposed? If you want to know when some Lisp is > > run by a process filter, then make the filter function pass an > > argument to that Lisp saying it's run by a filter. Will that do? > > Passing an argument to this function, which is way way way down in the > call stack, isn't practical. And it would be irrelevant to most of the > url.el code, anyway. Then bind a variable to a special value, and test it down below. Will that fit the bill?