From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 4d3a595: `load-path' should contain only directory names Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 05:42:08 +0200 Message-ID: <831tcf4q27.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20151023135532.11512.53356@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <83mvv8wejc.fsf@gnu.org> <86bnboeymw.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <83wpuadc9k.fsf@gnu.org> <86d1w1ahsy.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <562E2A8A.1030601@yandex.ru> <83wpu9bns4.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3khbhz7.fsf@gnu.org> <83eggg419o.fsf@gnu.org> <834mhc3yu5.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1446003731 6590 80.91.229.3 (28 Oct 2015 03:42:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 03:42:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 28 04:42:02 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZrHcf-0004Tl-JZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 04:42:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35440 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZrHce-0000Ov-Vh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 23:42:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53138) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZrHcc-0000Op-BE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 23:41:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZrHcZ-0003AN-5t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 23:41:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout26.012.net.il ([80.179.55.182]:42859) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZrHcY-0003AB-Tv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 23:41:55 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout26.012.net.il by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NWW00K00VKV3V00@mtaout26.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 05:45:19 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NWW000I3VRIXE80@mtaout26.012.net.il>; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 05:45:19 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:192773 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: dgutov@yandex.ru, stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 18:18:39 -0400 > > > I see nothing wrong with recommending best practices in doc strings. > > I don't see why "foo/bar" is better than "/foo/bar/", really. So it's > not a question of best practice. > > > We do that all the time. > > Yes, when one of the options is better (or worse) than the others. > This is a different case. Not IMO.