From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: A proposal for removing obsolete packages Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 05:35:03 +0200 Message-ID: <831t9ba9lk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83twmkkv16.fsf@gnu.org> <838u3k9m5d.fsf@gnu.org> <8760yohtqq.fsf@fastmail.fm> <8337ts9dnz.fsf@gnu.org> <874me8hsl6.fsf@fastmail.fm> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1453347318 28498 80.91.229.3 (21 Jan 2016 03:35:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 03:35:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ahyatt@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: =?utf-8?Q?Andr=C3=A9s_Ram=C3=ADrez?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 21 04:35:17 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aM61l-0002O7-7B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 04:35:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45898 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aM61k-0000Ry-CM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 22:35:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51350) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aM61g-0000RZ-93 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 22:35:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aM61b-0007qz-Sz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 22:35:12 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:36639) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aM61b-0007qt-Pu; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 22:35:07 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4065 helo=HOME-C4E4A596F7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aM61K-0000DG-Hp; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 22:34:51 -0500 In-reply-to: <874me8hsl6.fsf@fastmail.fm> (message from =?utf-8?Q?Andr?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9s_Ram=C3=ADrez?= on Wed, 20 Jan 2016 16:03:01 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:198486 Archived-At: > From: Andrés Ramírez > Cc: ahyatt@gmail.com, > rms@gnu.org, > monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 16:03:01 -0500 > > On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 15:52:32 -0500, > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > > > From: Andrés Ramírez > > > Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 15:38:05 -0500 > > > > > > What about byte-compilation. > > > Does obsolete packages should be byte-compiled when compiling emacs? > > > > Why not? > Cos we are trying to get rid of them. No, we are not. When we decide to get rid of them, we delete them.