From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: etags failing with structure members Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 11:21:08 +0200 Message-ID: <831su5fpx7.fsf@gnu.org> References: <58C25BCF.4010704@gmx.at> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1489137746 32436 195.159.176.226 (10 Mar 2017 09:22:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:22:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 10 10:22:22 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cmGkc-0007fE-Jw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 10:22:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38124 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cmGki-00031i-Lk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 04:22:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37845) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cmGjt-0002zy-Fb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 04:21:34 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cmGjp-0002hW-8O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 04:21:33 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:33336) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cmGjp-0002hJ-5Y; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 04:21:29 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3830 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cmGjo-0005wc-DL; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 04:21:28 -0500 In-reply-to: <58C25BCF.4010704@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Fri, 10 Mar 2017 08:54:55 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:212872 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 08:54:55 +0100 > From: martin rudalics > > An excerpt of the contents of my src/TAGS file after scanning the > `frame' structure with current master: > > ... > bool_bf mouse_moved 297,10416 > bool_bf pointer_invisible 300,10495 > bool_bf frozen_window_starts 304,10651 > ENUM_BF 309,10870 > union output_data445,15670 > struct tty_output *tty;tty447,15694 > struct x_output *x;x448,15750 > struct w32_output *w32;w32449,15803 > struct ns_output *ns;ns450,15858 > intptr_t nothing;451,15912 > output_data;453,15938 > ... > > All taggable entries between > > ENUM_BF (output_method) output_method : 3; > > #ifdef HAVE_WINDOW_SYSTEM > /* See FULLSCREEN_ enum on top. */ > ENUM_BF (fullscreen_type) want_fullscreen : 4; > > /* If not vertical_scroll_bar_none, we should actually > display the scroll bars of this type on this frame. */ > ENUM_BF (vertical_scroll_bar_type) vertical_scroll_bar_type : 2; > > /* Nonzero if we should actually display horizontal scroll bars on this frame. */ > bool_bf horizontal_scroll_bars : 1; > #endif /* HAVE_WINDOW_SYSTEM */ > ... > > and > > ... > /* Canonical X unit. Width of default font, in pixels. */ > int column_width; > > /* Canonical Y unit. Height of a line, in pixels. */ > int line_height; > > /* The terminal device that this frame uses. If this is NULL, then > the frame has been deleted. */ > struct terminal *terminal; > > are missing. This is a known problem: the tricky macro syntax used by some of the header files run afoul of the etags parsing. I tried once to find a solution for that, I might look into this again.